The Jury House

Now that i'm seeing things clearer, I don't think Steve really played an all around game. He just won stuff and made one deal with Debbie that kept him in the game.

so basically steve is in the end because of debbie but at the same time ember is in the end because of steve

The main reason, I think so. As for Ember? Hmm...........if it's me, you, Ember, Max, and Debbie. I think me and Ember get nominated. Since Steve isn't there to win the veto, it's a tossup between me and Debbie considering I was only one point below her. Let's say I clutch the win, you get thrown up, and Ember leaves. So yeah. But let's say Debbie wins, she keeps things the same, and Ember leaves. Well I don't know who leaves in that instance, but I think I would leave due to Max keeping me, and you keeping Ember. Debbie breaks the tie sending me home. I still see Ember at the end.

i meant ember is in the end because steve took her.

i’m just stuck on that if ember thought she didn’t need steve in the game why she kept him at final 9. she had the social connections to not be a target, but decided to keep someone even she said she didn’t think she would have a chance in the end against

I think I’m gonna vote for her. Steve’s answers were very good but her answers were otherworldly and I do think she played the best social game by a lot!!! Me and Tony were the only ones who wanted her out for a very long time! And she did come in 2nd in like 7 comps so that’s impressive, idk this is so tough

Sam Gardner wrote:

i meant ember is in the end because steve took her.

i’m just stuck on that if ember thought she didn’t need steve in the game why she kept him at final 9. she had the social connections to not be a target, but decided to keep someone even she said she didn’t think she would have a chance in the end against

I think just for the added protection. She knew Steve was a beast and could win and take out targets to lessen the blood on her hands. Risky? Sure, but I think it was necessary. She also played up to Steve's ego with him thinking he had this jury swept due to her being unliked.

Dorothy Gale wrote:

Sam Gardner wrote:

i meant ember is in the end because steve took her.

i’m just stuck on that if ember thought she didn’t need steve in the game why she kept him at final 9. she had the social connections to not be a target, but decided to keep someone even she said she didn’t think she would have a chance in the end against

I think just for the added protection. She knew Steve was a beast and could win and take out targets to lessen the blood on her hands. Risky? Sure, but I think it was necessary. She also played up to Steve's ego with him thinking he had this jury swept due to her being unliked.

BIG FACTS

Still need 3 votes. 46 minutes left.

I think it’s cute that Dorothy is campaigning for Ember. Sweetie you’re not a finalist. Anyway I’m going to be voting the opposite of Dot <3

I don't have to be a finalist to point out someone's flaws. I don't get how you can be cool one minute and an absolute bitch the next.

let's all choose love omg i love u all!!!!

On a serious note I think ember did fine except Ember’s goal of taking out Steve was never achieved; whereas Steve was able to make finals with someone he wanted to make finals with. So IMO it’s more impressive he got to the end with who he wanted AND still played a compelling game whereas Ember’s game is flawed since all the cards did not align exactly the way she wanted it to.

Dorothy Gale wrote:

I don't have to be a finalist to point out someone's flaws. I don't get how you can be cool one minute and an absolute bitch the next.

LMAO learn to take a joke instead of trying to bring women down

They both played different games, just one was worth voting for more <3

Dorothy Gale wrote:

They both played different games, just one was worth voting for more <3

It’s your opinion bby <3